arXiv (All)
open access
Evidence-RL: Towards Evidence-intensive Visual Reasoning
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) should answer from concrete image evidence rather than language priors, dataset shortcuts, or irrelevant visual context. Existing perception-aware post-training methods encourage image use through global perturbations or attention proxies, but they do not test whether a
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Real Images, Worse Judgments: Evaluating Vision-Language Models on Concreteness and Imagery#974439
- The Visual Insensitivity Gap: Diagnosing When Vision-Language Models Fail to Use Visual Evidence#820870
- Don't Send What You Don't Need: Question-Guided Token Pruning as a Privacy Defense for Vision-Language Models#1109649
- Slow to See, Slow to Suppress: Understanding the Effects of Modality in Context-Memory Conflicts#819749
- Slow to See, Slow to Suppress: Understanding the Effects of Modality in Context-Memory Conflicts#809753
Record · ID 1128630
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive