arXiv (All)
open access
Nudgeability: Reasoning Models Follow Confidence Signals Without Tracking Their Own Competence
Reasoning language models that can call tools must decide during inference whether to answer unaided or delegate. Any self-reflection mechanism for this must answer three questions: where the reflective signal comes from (verbal reports, output distributions, hidden states, a separate predictor), ho
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Calibration, Not Answer Selection: Distilling Internal Confidence in Reasoning Models#1118002
- Humans Disengage, Reasoning Models Persist: Separating Difficulty Registration from Deliberation Allocation#1083122
- Towards Efficient Reasoning: Learning Causal Shortcuts for Diffusion Language Models#1064816
- OverThink: Slowdown Attacks on Reasoning LLMs#1034641
- Post-Reasoning: Improving the Performance of Non-Thinking Models at No Cost#1084202
Record · ID 1128837
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive