arXiv (All)
open access
Investigating Learner-Aware Design of LLM-Generated Educational Feedback
Although large language models (LLMs) show promise for generating educational feedback, it remains unclear how feedback should be designed (e.g., tone and coverage) to support answer revision and learner evaluations across learner profiles. We define six feedback designs for multiple-choice biology
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Learning to Select and Rank from Choice-Based Feedback: A Simple Nested Approach#665432
- Learning to Select and Rank from Choice-Based Feedback: A Simple Nested Approach#663932
- Evaluating Large Language Model Performance on Open-Ended Questions: Answering and Marking Capabilities#1180066
- The impact of generative artificial intelligence tools on assessment equity for non-native English-speaking medical students: a systematic review.#295395
- LLM-as-a-judge validity is strongly task-dependent across physics assessment formats#1116232
Record · ID 1129173
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive