arXiv (All)
open access
On the Limits of Metacognitive Monitoring in LLMs
Reliable decisions depend on recognizing when an answer may be wrong. In biological cognition, metacognitive monitoring can dissociate from task performance, raising the question of how closely solving and judging are linked in language models. Here we study the confidence reports of four frontier m
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Elaboration Drift: How Human–LLM Interaction Erodes Epistemic Traction#91604
- Decision processes underlying effort avoidance and their relationship with metacognition.#465116
- Metacognition as Evidence for Evidentialism#735048
- Large Language Models Show Metacognitive Sensitivity in Medical Reasoning#610055
- Large Language Models Show Metacognitive Sensitivity in Medical Reasoning#608993
Record · ID 1129477
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive