arXiv (All)
open access
Verifying the Linear Representation Hypothesis: How Interpretable Are Vision SAEs?
Vision Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) have become a popular tool in Mechanistic Interpretability due to their presumed ability to disentangle complex features learned by a model into monosemantic concepts. Despite their growing popularity, evaluating their interpretability remains an active topic of res
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Neither Adversarial Training Nor Purification: Emergent Adversarial Robustness from Oscillatory Predictive Learning#986014
- Capsule Lens: Locating and Tracking Concept Geometry in Model Representations#972631
- Active Budget Can Kill Sensitivity: Diagnosing and Repairing TopK Sparse Autoencoder Reliability#1143907
- Faithful Faithfulness Evaluations: Challenges & Pitfalls Learned from a Breast MRI Case Study#1061883
- Peer review SmsCcr5j#928177
Record · ID 1129624
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive