arXiv (All)
open access
Latency and accuracy tradeoffs in Spiking Neural Networks
Spiking neural networks are attractive for low-power speech command recognition, yet their latency has received far less attention than their energy efficiency, and their multi-timestep execution is widely assumed to make them slower than quantized neural networks. This paper challenges the assumpti
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Contrastive Attention Mitigates Spectral Bias in Spiking Transformers#1156675
- Selection and Optimization of Temporal Spike Encoding Methods for Spiking Neural Networks#19745
- Zephyr: An Efficient Audio Denoising System Using Spiking Neural Networks Enabled With A Sparsity-Aware Flexible FPGA PE Array#1142023
- PTQ4SNN: Membrane-Aware Post-Training Quantization for Spiking Neural Networks#1061767
- Learnable Burst Quantization for Expressive and Efficient Spiking Neural Networks#1012202
Record · ID 1129854
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive