arXiv (All)
open access
Do Coding Agents Reuse Existing Code or Reinvent the Wheel?
Coding agents are increasingly deployed for iterative development on real repositories, yet existing evaluation barely answers a basic question: \emph{do coding agents reuse existing code or reinvent the wheel?} The question matters: every duplicated implementation is a fix applied twice and agents
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Do Coding Agents Reuse Existing Code or Reinvent the Wheel?#1108818
- Understanding the Architecture of Coding Agents: An Exploratory Study Using a Research Prototype#444699
- SetupX: Can LLM Agents Learn from Past Failures in Functionality-Correct Code Repository Setup?#229578
- Beyond Compliance: A Large Scale Study on the Completeness and Consistency of the GitHub SBOMs#343548
- When Does Restricting a Coding Agent to execute_code Help? A Regime $\times$ Agent-Design Ablation#363335
Record · ID 1129949
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive