arXiv (All)
open access
LLM-Assisted Automatic Security Proofs for Cryptographic Protocols: How Far Are We?
Large language models (LLMs) have shown strong potential for assisting software and security analysis tasks, yet their effectiveness in cryptographic symbolic protocol verification remains insufficiently understood. In this paper, we conduct the first systematic evaluation of the capability of sta
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- LLM-Assisted Automatic Security Proofs for Cryptographic Protocols: How Far Are We?#1108605
- Evaluating the Architectural Reasoning Capabilities of LLM Provers via the Obfuscated Natural Number Game#151735
- A Hybrid LLM-Based Framework for Automated Security Annotation Generation in Business Process Models#458225
- The Shape of Ownership: Verifying LLM Provenance through Semantic Structures#924711
- The Shape of Ownership: Verifying LLM Provenance through Semantic Structures#920477
Record · ID 1130022
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive