arXiv (All)
open access
Less Sycophancy, Stronger Refusal? Lessons for AI Safety from Mechanistic Interpretability
Reliable refusal of harmful requests is essential to the safe deployment of language models. Because excessive eagerness to please users may undermine existing refusal capabilities, reducing sycophancy offers a potential route to stronger refusal beyond the harmful scenarios covered by safety traini
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Less Sycophancy, Stronger Refusal? Lessons for AI Safety from Mechanistic Interpretability#1108781
- Dissecting Embodied Abilities in Multimodal Language Models through Skill-level Evaluation and Diagnosis#612848
- Dissecting Embodied Abilities in Multimodal Language Models through Skill-level Evaluation and Diagnosis#611371
- Conceptual Engineering and the Dynamics of Linguistic Intervention#709823
- Catcalls and Unwanted Conversations#83897
Record · ID 1130125
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive