arXiv (All)
open access
On the largest prime factors of $p-1$ and $p+1$
We prove that each of the inequalities $P^{+}(p+1)>P^{+}(p-1)$ and $P^{+}(p-1)>P^{+}(p+1)$ holds for a positive proportion of primes. The argument combines a logarithmic balance identity with a uniform Selberg sieve over a thin cofactor strip. The same transfer mechanism applies to either shift and
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A finite arithmetic form of Robin's inequality and its equivalence to the Riemann hypothesis#1062711
- On subradically sifted sums related to Alladi's higher order duality between prime factors#926969
- Tilting Billingsley's model toward a giant prime: two phase transitions#999424
- Selberg sieve weights and sign changes of Kloosterman sums. I. Uniform asymptotics for shifted weights#1050431
- The Divisor Mirror: A Geometric Invariant for Integer Structure#166990
Record · ID 1130264
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive