arXiv (All)
open access
Failure-Transparent Agents: Benchmarking Post-Failure Reporting in Tool-Using Language Models
Tool-using agents can fail twice: a required tool can fail, and the agent can then report success without the evidence needed to justify it. Existing benchmarks often entangle this reporting failure with tool selection, recovery, and environment dynamics. We introduce Failure-Transparent Agents (FTA
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Failure-Transparent Agents: Benchmarking Post-Failure Reporting in Tool-Using Language Models#1108791
- QBugLM: An Agentic Benchmarking Framework for LLM-based Quantum Software Debugging#1062922
- APIFlow-Bench: Measuring Whether Agents Survive Long, Dependent API Workflows#622623
- Quantization Thresholds Replicate, Failure Modes Do Not: A Three-Model Study of Agentic Tool Use in Polish from 8-bit to 2-bit#1115998
- AsynCodeBench: Benchmarking Collaboration of Asynchronous Multi-Agent Systems in Software Engineering#1116993
Record · ID 1130381
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive