arXiv (All)
open access
Rubric-Calibrated Preferences: Cross-Query Calibration of LLM Judgments via Item Response Theory
Rerankers decide which documents users and LLMs see, yet their standard metric, nDCG, relies on human relevance labels that are costly, sparse, noisy, and discretely graded. As rerankers approach each other in quality, nDCG on these labels therefore increasingly fails to separate them. LLM judges co
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- BoundaryMORPH: Budgeted Reranking via Active Set Selection for Diffuse Retrieval#1063424
- The Recall Ceiling of LLM Recommendation Reranking#1064497
- Risk-Controlled Selective LLM Answering by Pricing Label-Free Checks#1141815
- Judging a Review by its Cover: A Reliability Analysis of LLM-based Peer Review Evaluation Metrics#1049008
- JEV vs. LLMs as Rubric Judges: Cheaper, Faster, and Wrong in the Same Places#1077696
Record · ID 1130386
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive