arXiv (All)
open access
FinAutoRubric: Expert-Guided Automatic Rubric Generation for Evaluating Financial Research Agents
Evaluating finance research agents requires rubrics that reflect expert standards and fix the values correct as of an information cutoff. Expert-reviewed finance benchmarks rely on fixed, per-item rubrics, which are costly to extend and cannot encode each institution's own standard. In FinAutoRubric
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- FinAutoRubric: Expert-Guided Automatic Rubric Generation for Evaluating Financial Research Agents#1108789
- Propose to Learn, Learn to Propose: Evaluability-Aware Assistance under Bounded Rationality#822632
- Measuring the Quality of AI-Generated Clinical Notes: A Systematic Review and Experimental Benchmark of Evaluation Methods#140171
- Measuring the quality of AI-generated clinical notes: A systematic review and experimental benchmark of evaluation methods.#136092
- Protocol for a systematic review on specialty-specific meta-research studies evaluating artificial intelligence author guidelines.#173499
Record · ID 1130391
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive