arXiv (All)
open access
Do Proactive Agents Need an LLM to Decide When to Act?
Proactive assistants continuously decide when to intervene and what context should support the intervention. Large language model (LLM) pipelines repeatedly interpret activity histories to make these decisions, paying an inference cost even when the assistant remains silent. We show that a small gra
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Do Proactive Agents Really Need an LLM to Decide When to Wake and What to Anchor?#238668
- Reasoning Without Inference Cost: Latent Semantic Scaffolding for Robot VLA Policies#971554
- RL-STaR: Theoretical Analysis of Reinforcement Learning Frameworks for Self-Taught Reasoner#1037681
- Divide-and-Remember: Recursive Action-Relevant Memory for Long-Horizon VLA Policies#1155917
- AGM: Achievement-Grounded Memory for Closed-Loop Agents with Frozen VLA Policies#798182
Record · ID 1130565
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive