arXiv (All)
open access
Rater State Bias in RLHF Preference Data: An Audit Framework
We identify a structured confound in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF). Pairwise preference labels are intended to reflect the compared outputs, but they may also reflect the rater's state during annotation. Under sustained stressful or distressing conditions, raters' preferences may
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Beyond Verbalized Confidence: Calibrating Reasoners with Differentiable Readouts#1129470
- CARE-VI: Conservative Adaptive Reliability Estimation for Value Improvement in Off-Policy Actor-Critic Learning#1033876
- A Scalable Entity-Based Framework for Auditing Bias in Large Language Models#1128546
- Surprising Success, Repeated Failure: Entropy-Guided Credit Assignment for Exploration in LLM Reasoning#1118854
- RMB: Reward Model Boosting Mitigates Reward Hacking#1117933
Record · ID 1130589
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive