arXiv (All)
open access
Large Language Models Exhibit Human-Like Bayesian Hypocrisy
Given recent achievements of large language models (LLMs), frontier models are expected to perform well on Bayesian reasoning tasks, at least as well as humans. Furthermore, there is no reason to expect that LLMs will condemn others who offer those very same Bayesian judgments, a fallibility observe
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Decomposing and Measuring Evaluation Awareness#1131543
- Less Is Moral: A CHARMing Framework for Moral Foundations Detection in Endorsement Behaviour#984254
- Binarization Flattens the Score Space#1130639
- Large Language Models' Ability to Assess Main Concepts in Story Retelling: A Proof-of-Concept Comparison of Human Versus Machine Ratings.#247720
- Assessment of vaccine information accuracy across large language models.#334957
Record · ID 1130621
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive