arXiv (All)
open access
Reliable but Design-Sensitive: Instrument Uncertainty in LLM Annotation
Large language models (LLMs) can give reliable labels under one setup yet change those labels when researchers make other reasonable design choices. We tested seven LLMs, 12 task designs, three independent runs, and 3,000 tweets labeled for offensive language and hate speech. Repeating the same mode
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Decisional Pathways in ESG Labeling: Consumer Behavioral Responses to Digital and Accessible Design#167661
- Post-hoc Alignment of LLM-judges to Human Judgment Distribution#821056
- Beyond "To whom it may concern": Tailoring Machine Translation to Audience and Intent#798934
- Beyond "To whom it may concern": Tailoring Machine Translation to Audience and Intent#797520
- Programmers Are Poor and Overconfident Judges of LLM-Generated Assertions#361535
Record · ID 1130666
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive