arXiv (All)
open access
Says Block, Still Acts: Why LLM Safety Judgments Fail to Govern Action in LLM Agents
Large language model agents can correctly judge that an action should be blocked while still preferring to take it. We ask why this judgment-action disconnect arises, and whether explicit safety judgment causally governs subsequent action preference. Across three open-weight language models, safety-
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Agent Safety From Within: Detecting Harmful Trajectories from LLM Internal States#1117751
- Safety Theatre And The Suppression of Agency#726728
- ForesightSafety-SAGE:A Fully Automated Scenario Generation and Safety Evaluation Framework for LLM Agents#800068
- Engineering Simplicity: Simple Mechanism Interfaces Steer LLM Agents#1131207
- COUNTERMEM: World-Model Verified Counter-Factual Memory for Language Agents#1115830
Record · ID 1130712
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive