arXiv (All)
open access
Agentic Commerce Bench: Measuring Fraud Detection for Agents That Spend Money
AI agents now hold spend authority and settle payments without per-action human confirmation. The resulting loss is often not a security failure: a counterparty with the correct domain, the correct settlement address and a genuinely delivered service can charge more than it should, and no check keye
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Decision-Centered Reference Architecture for Trustworthy Agentic Commerce#386773
- Lies We Can See: Joint Verbal and Non-Verbal Deception by VLM Agents in Embodied Social Interactions#799631
- Skills as Verifiable Artifacts: A Trust Schema and a Biconditional Correctness Criterion for Human-in-the-Loop Agent Runtimes#151794
- Runtime Compliance Verification for AI Agents#287188
- Trust and Task Completion in the World of Consumer AI Agents#1117729
Record · ID 1130728
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive