arXiv (All)
open access
A Polyphonic Conception of AI Understanding
When a doctor, a judge, or an engineer must decide whether to trust an AI model's output, they cannot avoid asking what the model understands. Purely mathematical or statistical descriptions struggle to distinguish trustworthy from untrustworthy outputs without reintroducing the question of AI under
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Conceptualizing Uncertainty: A Concept-Based Approach to Explaining Uncertainty#965572
- EvalDetectBench: A Benchmark for Measuring Evaluation Awareness in Frontier Language Models#822052
- Language-dependent diagnostic safety of medical AI systems: a cross-lingual benchmarking and prospective clinical study#293989
- The Impact of Sycophantic AI on Attitudes and Decisions#435014
- Confidence as a common currency between vision and audition#719080
Record · ID 1130921
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive