arXiv (All)
open access
Socio-cognitive models in a patch foraging setting: a case study for model selection and parameter identifiability methods
Collective patch-foraging experiments in the laboratory provide a controlled setting in which social information use can be quantified. Here, we consider a go/no-go task in which groups choose between two patches differing in food reward probability. We use agent-based simulations, underpinned by an
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Multi-Agent Empowerment and Emergence of Complex Behavior in Groups#1084186
- Differential weighting of social and empirical statistical evidence in decision-making#295766
- Paths to diversity: a simulation of conformity in environments with different geometry#101169
- Cooperation increases verbal and spatial coordination in human foraging groups in the wild#276813
- Social Laws for Multi-agent Coordination in Stochastic Environments#1013086
Record · ID 1131073
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive