arXiv (All)
open access
Towards Mitigating Deceptive Safety Alignment in Large Reasoning Models
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) are commonly trained with reinforcement learning (RL) to improve their generation of chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning before producing final answers. However, RL rewards are typically assigned based on final answers, providing little or no direct supervision over interm
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- DeShortcut-Align: Decoupling Spurious Shortcuts for Robust Safety Alignment in Large Reasoning Models#1129507
- On the Pitfalls of Verbalized Confidence Priors for Calibrating Large Reasoning Models#1116801
- Apriel-Reasoner: RL Post-Training for General-Purpose and Efficient Reasoning#984141
- Beyond Safe Answers: Segment-Aware Listwise Alignment for Reasoning Safety in Large Reasoning Models#1109515
- What are Key Factors for Updates in RL for LLM Reasoning?#1036727
Record · ID 1131096
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive