arXiv (All)
open access
Where Should Physics Enter a Molecular Crystal Generator?
Generative models make molecular crystal structure prediction fast, but their samples still exhibit geometric and packing violations. Physics can be introduced during training, post-training, or inference, yet these choices are rarely compared with the generator and physical signal held fixed. We in
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Machine learning for molecular and materials science#686317
- Unlocking Multi-Component Bulk-Materials Molecular Dynamics with a Small-Footprint Machine Learning Interatomic Potential#620729
- Unlocking Multi-Component Bulk-Materials Molecular Dynamics with a Small-Footprint Machine Learning Interatomic Potential#619050
- Procedural Pretraining for Molecular Property Prediction#1011546
- Probabilistic Deep Learning Framework for Phase Transformation Forecasting aided by In Situ High temperature Microscopy#1123350
Record · ID 1131240
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive