arXiv (All)
open access
Guard Models Are Overconfident Where Base Models Are Uncertain
Guard models are used as safety classifiers, with confidence scores driving downstream moderation decisions. We evaluate five guard models for prompt classification and find that although several are nearly calibrated on clean inputs, adversarial attacks degrade their calibration by an order of magn
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Shielded Analysis: Certification and Characterization of Defensibility in Systems under Adversarial Interaction#1123125
- Watch your steps: Dormant Adversarial Behaviors that Activate upon LLM Finetuning#799861
- On the Existence of Consistent Adversarial Attacks in High-Dimensional Linear Classification#820208
- The Fixation of Belief in Machines: Disciplined Contestation as an Alternative to Mutual Adversarial Oversight#695945
- Reflect-Guard: Enhancing LLM Safeguards against Adversarial Prompts via Logical Self-Reflection#224424
Record · ID 1131319
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive