arXiv (All)
open access
Large-scale factor analysis shows machine intelligence is only partially interpretable
A common assumption in language model development is that cognitive abilities are organized around a general, domain-free intelligence factor, like fluid intelligence in humans. This assumption is rarely tested directly, and prior attempts have done so only at a much smaller scale. We take a latent
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Human- vs. AI-generated tests: dimensionality and information accuracy in latent trait evaluation#1076763
- Latent Profiles on the Intelligence and Development Scales – 2 and their Relationship with Classifications of Dyslexia and ADHD#236839
- Latent Profiles on the Intelligence and Development Scales – 2 and their Relationship with Classifications of Dyslexia and ADHD#1148188
- Psychometric Validation of the Core Emotion Framework: Factor Structure and Reliability of the Scenario Based Ten Operator Scale (Phase 1)#248521
- Identifying mental states: A celebrated hypothesis refuted#736892
Record · ID 1131716
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive