arXiv (All)
open access
Grounded Revision vs. Prior Injection: Probing Retrieval-Augmented Patent Claim Amendment
Retrieval-augmented generation is widely used in professional writing, yet whether retrieval grounds revision or merely injects templates is rarely tested where "correct" has a definable meaning. Patent claim amendment supplies that signal: the examiner names the attacked limitation and cites prior
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Keyword-based Augmentation Method to Enhance Abstractive Summarization for Legal Documents#419015
- 37 CFR Part 90 — Judicial Review of Patent Trial and Appeal Board Decisions#509141
- Electronic Court Filing Version 5.0 (2019-04-19)#600635
- 37 CFR Part 42 — Trial Practice Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board#509139
- Global Standard Essential Patent Litigation: Anti-Suit and Anti-Anti-Suit Injunctions#477933
Record · ID 1131751
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive