arXiv (All)
open access
Multi-Channel Mitigation of Source-Trust Shortcuts in Fact-Checking RL Agents
Retrieval-augmented fact-checkers often receive a reliability label, such as HIGH or LOW trust, for each evidence source. These labels should adjust the model's confidence and its decision to search for more evidence, while the verdict should follow the evidence content. We introduce TrustSwap, a co
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- R2VC: Modular Fact-Checking with Retrieval, Verification, and Confidence Calibration#999939
- Atomic Fact-Checking Increases Clinician Trust in Large Language Model Recommendations for Oncology Decision Support: A Randomized Controlled Trial#155332
- To Trust or Not to Trust: Retrieval-Augmented Fact Checking in Speech#1078298
- Verify Claims, Not Scores: Evidence-Based Verification of Modular Agents#1156620
- SkillApt: Learning When to Activate Agent Skills from Counterfactual Evidence#1063074
Record · ID 1131812
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive