arXiv (All)
open access
Generating Edit-Inducing Questions for AI Research Manuscripts
We study the ability of LLMs to generate edit-inducing questions whose answer will improve a paper draft. On a dataset of paired submission and camera-ready papers from ICLR and NeurIPS, we compare the helpfulness of questions from GPT models with or without full paper context to that of human revie
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- CALIBRATED AI REVIEWER: AN ALGORITHM FOR COMPARING SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS WITH HIGH AND LOW ENTRY BARRIERS#141283
- Unjustified Sample Sizes and Generalizations in Explainable AI Research: Principles for More Inclusive User Studies#80012
- FormalTCS: Benchmarking End-to-End Frontier Formal Theoretical Computer Science Research of Large Language Models#821477
- Advancing U.S. Public Health Surveillance: Leveraging Generative AI and Agentic Systems for the National HIV Behavioral Surveillance Program#76764
- Independent Submissions to the RFC Editor#254518
Record · ID 1131818
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive