PhilArchive
open access
Disagreement and Permissiveness
Considers how the Uniqueness Thesis interacts with the proper response to disagreement, by dividing disagreements into three types and considering the roles of epistemic standards in each type.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Uniqueness Thesis: A Hybrid Approach#722962
- Agency and Disagreement#725221
- Alleged Counterexamples to Uniqueness#76792
- Junk, Numerosity, and the Demands of Epistemic Consequentialism#724014
- Moral disagreement scepticism leveled#106825
Record · ID 113219
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive