PhilArchive
open access
The Rietdijk–Putnam–Maxwell Argument
This review paper provides a detailed overview and critical analysis of the philosophical literature on the Rietdijk–Putnam–Maxwell argument for the four-dimensionality of the world. After briefly introducing the debate on the dimensionality of the world, I present the arguments by Rietdijk, Putnam and Maxwell, and highlight the differences between them. I subsequently raise a total of eleven objections against the Rietdijk–Putnam–Maxwell argument, and conclude that its validity is underdetermined by the formalism of special relativity.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- In light of the theory of Special Relativity is a Passage of Time and the argument of the Presentist untenable?#720112
- Special Theory of Relativity Seen from a Perspective of the Humanities#743815
- The Coherent Now: A Relativistic Framework for Ontological Growth#108479
- What is Fundamental in Special Relativity?#165208
- The Speed of Light as an Unavoidable Spectral Ratio of the Universal Quartic Functional#709632
Record · ID 113225
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive