arXiv (All)
open access
Pointwise or Pairwise: When Do Pairwise Losses Help Reward Learning, Provably?
Pairwise losses are increasingly used for reward learning even when pointwise rewards are observed, with mixed empirical results. When and why do pairwise losses outperform pointwise losses? We study this question in a grouped offline contextual-bandit setting allowing multiple actions per context,
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Meta-LinEXP3: Online-within-Online Learning for Adversarial Linear Contextual Bandits#1123223
- Beyond the Trigger: Learning Collaborative Context for Generalizable Trigger-Induced Recommendation#144231
- STAR: SpatioTemporal Adaptive Reward Allocation for Text-to-Image RL Post-Training#282846
- RewardFlow: Generate Images by Optimizing What You Reward#2634
- Projecting Latent RL Actions: Towards Generalizable and Scalable Graph Combinatorial Optimization#204743
Record · ID 1132410
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive