arXiv (All)
open access
CRJudgeBench: Can AI Detect Plausible but Invalid Code Reviews?
Large language models can generate plausible code-review comments, but such comments may contain technically incorrect claims that mislead developers. We study technical trustworthiness judgment: determining whether a review comment's core technical claims are correct and applicable to the reviewed
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- CRJudgeBench: Can AI Detect Plausible but Invalid Code Reviews?#1122365
- Exploring the Role of Large Language Models in Automated Code Review and Software Quality Enhancement#82737
- Evaluating the Impact of Explainable AI on Trust in AI-Assisted Code Review#405692
- AI-to-AI Code Reviews of GitHub Pull Requests#480118
- Understanding the Limits of Automated Evaluation for Code Review Bots in Practice#138979
Record · ID 1132417
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive