eScholarship
metadata only
Economic Inequality, Access to Law, and Mandatory Arbitration Agreements: A Comment on the Standard Conception of the Lawyer’s Role
Academics have long debated the propriety of the traditional model of legal ethics, often referred to as the standard conception of the lawyer’s role, which combines the principles of “partisanship” and “neutrality.” Partisanship requires lawyers to promote the interests of their clients vigorously
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Evaluative-Facilitative Debate in Mediation: Applying the Lens of Therapeutic Jurisprudence#477110
- Modern Trend and Role of Jurisprudence in this Era#1178077
- A Thought of Legal Research with Examples and Demonstrations#744812
- Prevailing Cases of Lawyers' Liability in The Conduct of Cases a Case for Prefessional Indemnity#1042678
- Curiosities of law and lawyers#334142
Record · ID 1133032
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive