PhilArchive
open access
Can You Deny The PNC? (_Metaphysics_ Γ.3, 1005b11-34)
In Metaphysics Γ.3, Aristotle argues that it is impossible to deny the PNC. However, as several commentators—including Code, Barnes, Priest, Kirwan, and Dancy—have objected, Aristotle’s argument appears to rely on the invalid inference from 1 to 2 as follows: 1. For all p, it is impossible to believe that p and not-p. 2. Therefore, it is impossible to believe that it is possible that there is a p such that p and not-p. We argue that this objection turns on a misunderstanding of Aristotle’s text, and that Aristotle's argument is valid and quite strong.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Aristotle: processes and continuants#247982
- A Note on Aristotle and Beliefs about the Future#752667
- Conditionalization Does Not Maximize Expected Accuracy#715689
- An epistemology for the Platonist? Platonism, Field’s Dilemma, and Judgment-Dependent Truth#760513
- Transferable and Fixable Proofs#80503
Record · ID 113378
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive