PsyArXiv
metadata only
The role of pragmatic context in children’s quantification of parts and wholes
Why do children sometimes include the pieces of broken things when asked to count (e.g., “Count the forks”)? In five experiments, we test two ideas: (1) that adults, but not children, exclude parts from counts by reasoning that speakers must only be interested in whole objects with functions that fu
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Weak Distributive Inference in Language Acquisition#1168998
- Weak Distributive Inference in Language Acquisition#1167815
- How children map causal verbs to different causes across development#89539
- Object-mass nouns specify individuation lexically: Evidence from English and French#138714
- Why do preschoolers struggle with the 3-cups-task? Further evidence for cognitive asymmetries in representing what and where uncertainty#1159825
Record · ID 1135386
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive