Springer Nature OA
open access
CC BY 4.0
Procrastination and Psychosocial Drivers of Farmers’ Planned and Actual Adoption of Biofortified Crop Varieties
This chapter examines the relationship between the present bias, psychological barriers procrastination, technology information nudges, and their combined influence on the intentions and actual uptake of biofortified crops. It uses an information field experiment with 320 sweetpotato farmers in Keny
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Framework for Understanding the Role of Nudges in Agriculture#1135831
- Procrastinación académica en estudiantes peruanos de educación superior pedagógica.#953374
- Comparative performance and effect of selected agroforestry tree species on maize productivity in semi-arid Kenya#1027795
- Consumer Acceptance of Genetically Biofortified Food in Sub-Saharan Africa: Empirical Evidence from Nigeria#322682
- Why do teachers procrastinate? The role of fear of negative evaluation and intolerance of uncertainty.#678390
Record · ID 1135842
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive