PhilArchive
open access
Spinoza on Teleology, Action, and Explanatory Over-determination
I argue that Spinoza rejects teleological explanations wholesale. This is because of three of his distinctive theses: his naturalism, according to which all phenomena are governed by the same laws; his account of action, according to which we are active to the extent that we have adequate ideas; and his account of adequate causation, according to which a thing can have only one adequate cause.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Analysis of Reflection and Leibniz’s Early Response to Spinoza#110367
- Spinoza, Naturalism and the Question of God: Challenging the Orthodox Interpretation#722146
- Critiques of Axiological Realism and Surrealism#758996
- Spinoza's Rejection of Teleology#737645
- Teleosemantics, selection and novel contents#735873
Record · ID 113591
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive