arXiv CS
open access
Can Agents Trust Their Skills? Uncovering Unsafe Chains of Trust in Skill-Based LLM Agents
LLM agents increasingly rely on installable skills, which are packages of instructions, code, and resources that equip them with task-specific capabilities and, once installed, can be automatically invoked across subsequent user tasks. This creates a chain of trust in which users delegate authority
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Can Agents Trust Their Skills? Uncovering Unsafe Chains of Trust in Skill-Based LLM Agents#1144032
- SkillScope: Toward Fine-Grained Least-Privilege Enforcement for Agent Skills#998219
- Stealth Apart, Harm Together: Skill Cascading Attacks on Skill-Based Agent Systems#1104582
- Skills as Verifiable Artifacts: A Trust Schema and a Biconditional Correctness Criterion for Human-in-the-Loop Agent Runtimes#151794
- Proteus: A Self-Evolving Red Team for Agent Skill Ecosystems#1116279
Record · ID 1136779
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive