arXiv CS
open access
Unlearnable, or Unmeasured? On the Reliability of Difficulty Labels in RLVR
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has become an important approach for improving reasoning during post-training. Recent work suggests that some difficult prompts remain resistant to learning even when they occasionally produce correct solutions. We revisit this unlearnability phe
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Unlearnable, or Unmeasured? On the Reliability of Difficulty Labels in RLVR#1154382
- Beyond Verbalized Confidence: Calibrating Reasoners with Differentiable Readouts#1129470
- Learned Reporting Preferences in RLVR Can Conflict with the Current Request#1131788
- Cliff: Learning Process Rewards from the First Mistake#924942
- Cliff: Learning Process Rewards from the First Mistake#920708
Record · ID 1136873
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive