arXiv CS
open access
Better Deck or Different Judge? Evaluating Agentic Harness Gains in Corporate and Investment Banking
Corporate and investment banking teams use presentations to support credit decisions and advise clients on financing and transactions. Producing these decks requires reconciling financial data, tracing sources and turning analysis into a recommendation. We retrospectively study the development of an
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Better Deck or Different Judge? Evaluating Agentic Harness Gains in Corporate and Investment Banking#1145125
- The relationship between board characteristics and firm performance in Malaysian public listed companies#1025101
- Corporate boards and the performance of Asian firms: A meta-analysis#361944
- LiveOption: Evaluating LLM Agents in Structured Option Trading with Nonlinear Payoffs#1118182
- The Role of Bank Advisors in Mergers and Acquisitions#942625
Record · ID 1136888
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive