ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Three Final Impression Techniques for Severely Resorbed Mandibular Ridges
This in vivo crossover study aims to compare the accuracy of three different final impression techniques for severely resorbed mandibular ridges in completely edentulous patients. The accuracy of the impressions will be evaluated digitally using three-dimensional scanning and deviation analysis to determine differences among the impression techniques.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Trueness of Intra-Oral Scanners Compared to an Extra-Oral Scanner for Scanning of Mandibular Edentulous Impressions#1047289
- Análise da influência da placa de avanço mandibular no bruxismo noturno através de um método experimental#935227
- Evaluation of the Impact of Integrating Dynamic Patient-Specific Motion and Implementing a Jaw Tracking System in the Attribution of the Occlusion in Full-Arch Restorations Through a Digital Workflow: A Clinical Study#839541
- "Facially Driven Digital Full-Mouth Rehabilitation"#1047194
- Effect of Scanning Techniques on Accuracy of Mandibular Fixed Detachable Prostheses#826118
Record · ID 1137259
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive