ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparative Effectiveness of the Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
The purpose of this study is to compare three different revascularization strategies in patients with multi-vessel coronary disease: MICS CABG, OPCABG and ONCABG. The study hypothesis: MICS CABG (Minimally invasive cardiac surgery coronary artery bypass grafting) has advantages in comparison with conventional off-pump (OPCABG) and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (ONCABG) concerning major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE) and procedural success.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Cost-effectiveness of PCI With Taxus vs CABG - 5 Years FUP#828330
- TEB vs. Swan-Ganz catheter: hemodynamic monitoring agreement in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.#610274
- Barts Revascularisation Registry#1072534
- Follow-up of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Patency by Multislice Computed Tomography#905135
- Fractional Flow Reserve Guided Immediate Versus Staged Complete Myocardial Revascularization in Patients With ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Multivessel Disease (Future Study)#1104094
Record · ID 1137829
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive