ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Precision in Brackets Position in Two Indirect Bonding Materials
Objective: To compare the cementation precision of self-ligating brackets between two indirect bonding materials: polyvinylsiloxane and thermal glue. Methods: Split-mouth randomized clinical trial study, with 15 participants. The study will be divided into two groups, Group 1: Polyvinylsiloxane and Group 2: Thermal glue.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Evaluation of a "Flash-free" Adhesive Resin for Orthodontic Bracket Bonding#895958
- Comparison of Efficiency and Effectiveness of Two Types of Bonded Orthodontic Retainers: an RCT.#1126980
- Comparison of Bracket Bonding Variables Using 3D Printed Bonding Guide Versus Digital Indirect Bonding#1124383
- Digital vs. Conventional Indirect Bonding.#874881
- Comparison of Bond Strength Performance and Adhesive Remnant Patterns of APC™ Plus and APC™ Flash Free Orthodontic Brackets: In Vitro Study on Human Teeth#464214
Record · ID 1138517
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive