ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Vaginal Mesh Surgery Versus Robotic-assisted Abdominal Mesh Surgery in the Treatment of Apical Prolapse - Prospective Randomized Non-inferiority Study
The goal of this study is to compare vaginal mesh surgery with abdominal robotic-assisted mesh surgery for the treatment of genital prolapse in women. The main questions it seeks to answer are: * Is the objective cure rate for vaginal mesh surgery non-inferior to that of the abdominal approach? * Is the use of vaginal mesh as safe as abdominal mesh?
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Use of Different Types of Mesh for Prevention of Incisional Hernia Versus Primary Abdominal Suturing#1029979
- Anchor for Robotic Sacrocolpopexy#882135
- Demonstrate the Safety and Preformance of the SRS Device for the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse#801306
- Multicenter, Prospective, Non-randomized, Single-arm, Interventional Study for the Evaluation of the Safety and Preformance of the SRS Device for the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse#865919
- Sacrocolpopexy Versus Vaginal Mesh Procedure for Pelvic Prolapse#1139943
Record · ID 1138709
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive