ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
CLUBE (UBE Stability / Dynamic Radio)
Degenerative pathologies of the spine affect a large proportion of the increasingly ageing population, and are a major public health issue. When conservative treatments (physiotherapy, analgesics, infiltrations) fail, surgical treatment is preferred. Traditionally, a simple lumbar recalibration operation is preferred (bilateral laminectomy decompression), but this may affect spinal stability. In cases of spondylolisthesis or preoperative instability, lumbar fusion (arthrodesis) is sometimes necessary to avoid the risk of major instability, but such an operation is not without risk and may require repeat surgery. The development of new surgical techniques such as uni or bilateral laminotomies, which are less radical, has made it possible to avoid some arthrodeses. Nowadays, the emergence of new surgical techniques such as endoscopy has further reduced the risk of destabilization (shorter post-operative convalescence, less atrophy of the paraspinal muscles) and improved surgeon comfort (better vision and easier instrument handling). Unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) is one of two endoscopic techniques and has proven its effectiveness for lumbar decompression in terms of clinical benefits. However, there is no scientific evidence on spinal stability after recalibration under UBE. We believe that minimizing invasiveness with UBE during simple lumbar recalibration surgery can preserve spinal stability, thereby reducing the need for lumbar fixation and lowering the cost of care. We therefore propose to study the maintenance of spinal stability using dynamic radiography at 3 months post-operatively in patients undergoing lumbar recalibration surgery with UBE.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- "Efficacy of Hybrid Systems ("Topping Off") Versus Rigid Spinal Fusion in Lumbar Fusion Surgery: A Dual-center, Prospective, Randomized Pilot Study ("CD Horizon BalanC")"#1010619
- Interbody vs Instrumented Posterolateral Fusion Following Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Degenerative Spondylolisthesis#900815
- A Randomized Intra-Patient Controlled Trial of MagnetOs™ Putty vs Autograft in Instrumented Posterolateral Spinal Fusion in Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients#993006
- Spine Surgery for Lenke 1 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis#803311
- Titanium Surgical Mesh and MOSS-Miami Screws for Lumbar Fusion.#812731
Record · ID 1138746
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive