ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Commonly Used Drug Regimens for Rapid Sequence Intubation (RSI) of Trauma Patients in the Emergency Department
Airway is the first step in the initial assessment of a trauma patient. Often this assessment determines the need for endotracheal intubation, most commonly by rapid sequence intubation (RSI). Currently, there is no consensus on best practice for RSI drug regimens. Given the fragmented nature of this topic, most RSI drugs are chosen by the intubating physician based on their experience (i.e., a "dealer's choice"). Overall, emergency medical care is moving towards standardization to decrease medical errors and improve outcomes. Clearly, the current approach to RSI drug regimens does not align with those goals. This study seeks first to define commonly used RSI drug regimens for trauma, and second to investigate hospital course and long-term health outcomes as a potential way to define best practice RSI drugs for trauma patients. The study will be a multi-center retrospective chart review of data collected from January 1, 2014 to January 1, 2019, and will include Level I trauma centers in Texas. The University of Texas at Austin (UTA) is hosting this study as a Texas Level I Trauma Centers Multicenter Trial. Additional sites will have their own institutional IRB approval and will provide de-identified data to the principal investigator (PI) via secure encrypted email. Data will be submitted for MDMC trauma patients to UTA and analyzed within the Dell Med Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care and treated in the same way with the same security as data collected at Dell Seton Medical Center. The plan to complete the data collection and analysis by January 1, 2021. After de-identification, descriptive statistical analysis will be performed. Statistics reported will include frequencies. Logistic regression model to predict outcome will be performed. Odds ratio, confidence interval, and P value will be reported using logistic regression for outcome models for both adjusted and unadjusted models. The statistical software package SAS 9.3 will be used for all calcula
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Non-randomised, Non-inferiority Comparative Study of Oral Actiskenan (Morphine Sulfate) Versus Intranasal Sufentanil in the Early Management of Severe Acute Pain in Emergency Departments.#968086
- Relief Efficacy of Lidocaine Versus Morphine for Acute Renal Colic in the Emergency Department#891272
- IV vs Oral Acetaminophen in Spine Fusion Perioperative Care#900680
- EICU Analgesia and Sedation Cross-sectional Survey#1008197
- Continuum of Care in Hospitalized Patients With Opioid/Stimulant Use Disorder and Infectious Complications From Drug Use#1152212
Record · ID 1139162
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive