ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Randomized Evaluation of Atrial Fibrillation Treatment With Focal Impulse and Rotor Modulation Guided Procedures
The study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized study to assess the safety and effectiveness of FIRM procedures followed by conventional ablation including PVI versus a standard PVI procedure for the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF).
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparison Between Upgraded '2C3L' vs. PVI Approach for Catheter Ablation of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation#1060430
- Prevention to Improve Outcomes After PVI#1047554
- Early Versus Late DC-cardioversion of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. Effect on Atrial Remodeling,Inflammatory and Neurohumoral Markers and Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation#1153249
- Comparison of Pulmonary Vein Ablation With or Without Left Atrial Posterior Wall Ablation for Persistent AF (PIVoTAL)#813436
- Procedure RElated Outcomes With the Watchman FLX Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device#1075071
Record · ID 1139804
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive