ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Graft Patency in Beating Heart Vs. Conventional CABG Using Cardiac CT
The purpose of this study is to compare graft patency rates following coronary artery bypass graft surgery performed by beating heart vs. conventional techniques using cardiac CT scanning to evaluate the bypass grafts.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Graft Patency Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Via Minimally Invasive Coronary Surgery#1152199
- Coronary CT Angio Evaluating Graft Patency in ACS Patients Treated With DAPT or Single ASA After CABG (CoCAP)#1088056
- ClinicAL outComes of IntraVascular Lithotripsy Combined With Conventional Lesion Preparation in Patients With Moderate to Severe Coronary Artery Calcification#1103451
- Tacrolimus/Everolimus vs. Tacrolimus/MMF in Pediatric Heart Transplant Recipients Using the MATE Score#841678
- Assessment of Validity of Depth by PocketCPR as Sites of Smartphone on Arm#910849
Record · ID 1140192
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive