ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Retrospective Review of Saphenous Vein Incompetence: Venaseal Versus Endovenous Thermal Ablation
This study is a retrospective, chart review of treatment of patients with symptomatic varicose veins. Treated limbs must have the Great Saphenous Vein and/or Small Saphenous Vein treated with either cyanoacrylate closure (VenaSeal) or Endothermal Ablation (either Radiofrequency Ablation or Endovenous Laser Ablation).
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Fate Of Calf Perforators After Endovenous Laser Ablation Of Saphenous Veins#1057790
- Efficacy, Safety and Characteristics of the Amplatzer Vascular Plug II and IV Utilization for Various Percutaneous Occlusions in Children under 10 Years#262155
- Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) Of Tumors Acquired In Childhood#894568
- Clinical Anatomy of Superficial Veins of Lower Limbs#834394
- Use of a Bone Substitute Material in the Surgical Therapy of Furcation Defects#812025
Record · ID 1140322
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive