arXiv (All)
open access
Do Agent Benchmarks Do What They Say? An Executable-Contract Audit of Tool-Using Agent Environments
Tool-using agents are entering settings where a wrong action carries real cost, and the benchmarks certifying them grade what each simulated tool call reports having done, assuming the tool did what its interface advertises. The audit taxonomies we survey publish no category for that assumption, and
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Do Agent Benchmarks Do What They Say? An Executable-Contract Audit of Tool-Using Agent Environments#1122363
- Beyond Function Calling: Benchmarking Tool-Using Agents under Tool-Environment Unreliability#307073
- Bad Genius: Counterfactual-Guided Harness Evolution Beyond Task-Specific Shortcuts#1035625
- Robustness Analysis of Agentic AI to Inconsistent and Incomplete Tool Responses#793895
- Robustness Analysis of Agentic AI to Inconsistent and Incomplete Tool Responses#789876
Record · ID 1141358
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive